Derek Caelin <p>stopped reading</p>
The historian's craft by Marc Léopold Benjamin Bloch
In this classic work, distinguished French economic historian, Marc Bloch, discusses the techniques of historical observation, analysis, and criticism, and …
Seeking a Solarpunk Future
Sci Fi | Cozy Fic | Sustainable Living | Classics | Green Energy | He/Him/His.
This link opens in a pop-up window
In this classic work, distinguished French economic historian, Marc Bloch, discusses the techniques of historical observation, analysis, and criticism, and …
Let us guard against stripping our science of its share of poetry. Let us also beware of the inclination, which I have detected in some, to be ashamed of this poetic quality. It would be sheer folly to suppose that history, because it appeals strongly to the emotions, is less capable of satisfying the intellect.
This book is wild. The author, a French historian, muses about the craft of history - its purpose and functions. The year is 1941. A year before, the Germans had marched into Paris. Three years later, Bloch will be dead - an executed member of the Resistance. It gives the books real poignancy.
A highly engaging tour through progressive history in the service of emancipating our digital tomorrow.
When we talk about technology …
It's easy to take artificial light for granted and never think about what an enabling technology it is to be able to see equally well whether it's day or night or, for that matter, in any closed interior space. It's not a survival need, but seeing in the dark is effectively a superpower. While light has been scarce and expensive for almost all of human history, the past two centuries or so saw the cost of light (the price per lumen-hour) drop by a factor of ten thousand.
I never really thought of the cost of light
Groom's book looks at the background of Tolkien's legendarium, the way the text evolved over the years and decades, depiction of Tolkien's work in media, and the applicability of various themes as they apply today. I most enjoyed the history of the changing text. Aragorn was at one point a Hobbit named Trotter! Frodo was Bingo, Bilbo's son! It gave me insight into Tolkien's process of writing, which is to say, he wrote something, and then edited, then edited again. In this book he comes accross, not as a "grand architect", with everything planned in advance, but a tinkerer constantly changing, reworking, and rediscovering his text. Groom reveals how the process took decades, during which finances, overcommittment in work, and general life challenges made it nearly impossible to make progress on the text. I came away with a profound appreciation and wonder that Tolkien actually managed to finish "Lord of …
Groom's book looks at the background of Tolkien's legendarium, the way the text evolved over the years and decades, depiction of Tolkien's work in media, and the applicability of various themes as they apply today. I most enjoyed the history of the changing text. Aragorn was at one point a Hobbit named Trotter! Frodo was Bingo, Bilbo's son! It gave me insight into Tolkien's process of writing, which is to say, he wrote something, and then edited, then edited again. In this book he comes accross, not as a "grand architect", with everything planned in advance, but a tinkerer constantly changing, reworking, and rediscovering his text. Groom reveals how the process took decades, during which finances, overcommittment in work, and general life challenges made it nearly impossible to make progress on the text. I came away with a profound appreciation and wonder that Tolkien actually managed to finish "Lord of the Rings" at all. This, to me, was the most interesting and satisfying part of the book.
I was less entertained by the media explorations, but still found value in the review of the various radio dramas, movies, and game adaptations. (I'm newly inspired to listen to the BBC Radio Drama of Lord of the Rings staring Ian Holm as Frodo.) Groom waxes eloquent on Peter Jackson's interpretation of the Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit. He gives the Hobbit more credit on face value than I would, but I suppose his focus was on the choices made in adaptation and not the quality of the movies as cinema.
The exploration of Tolkien themes, was, in my opinion, the least compelling part of the book. Partly this was because Groom examines not only the books but also the movie adaptations and the things they have to say about war, environmentalism, and death. It's possible that I liked this part the least because I already have my own opinions on the themes and disagreed with Grooms interpretations. I grumbled quite a bit to my partner when the author (offhand, and perhaps as a joke) likens Faramir's resistance group in occupied Ithilien as "terrorism", or how he seemed to think that Orcs deserve sympathy because they would rebel against Sauron if they could. I was amused, more than anything, by the authors continual shots at Bilbo as "the most dishonest character" in Tolkien's legendarium. The reason I picked up the book was I was interested in reading about Tolkien's environmentalism. There is some discussion of that topic here, but it is not the principal focus.
Tolkien in the 21st Century was thought provoking, and surfaced a lot of things I didn't know about the story. It's worth a read!
Arthur C. Clarke winner and Sunday Times bestseller Adrian Tchaikovsky's triumphant return to fantasy with a darkly inventive portrait of …
What is it about Middle-Earth and its inhabitants that has captured the imagination of millions of people around the world? …
If the War of the Ring can be considered a just war, there are nevertheless important caveats. First, the allies of the West use the Rangers of Ithilien as masked and camouflaged resistance fighters to ambush troops on the move, which could equally be considered terrorism - as suggested by Kirill Yeskov's novel The Last Ringbearer (1999), a rewrite of The Return of the King from the point of view of the Orcs.
I read this line and turned to my wife with all the fury of a man who received a B+ in "The Fundamentals of International Law" in undergrad.
"Terrorism"? The Geneva Conventions, to which Gondor is a signatory party, clearly state a lawful combatant is i) commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates, ii) has a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance, iii) carries arms openly, and iv) conducts operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war. Mordor is going to claim terrorism because Captain Faramir, leader of a military unit with a clear chain of command, each of whom bears the sigil of the tree of Gondor, hid in some bushes before they attacked an occupying force?
Any credible judge would laugh that claim straight out of court. Absurd.
I appreciate how this book catalogues the effort of writing The Lord of the Rings. The constant revisions - Frodo was originally Bingo, Bilbo's son! Aragorn was once a Hobbit named Trotter with wooden shoes! - reveal how much the work was produced by feeling a story out and constantly revising it. Combined with the extraordinary overcommitment of Tolkien to his job as an academic, his own health and his wife's, and the numerous publications he either authored or edited, I am flabbergasted LotR was ever finished. There was just so much to do, and no efficient way to do it. I've tried much more modest writing projects and ended up curled into a little ball.
The story of filmmaker Hayao Miyazaki's life and work, including his significant impact on Japan and the world—"an essential work …
My friend Helen Macdonald's writing about the natural environment has influenced how I think about infrastructural systems. A forest is home to trees, plants, fungi, and lichen, as well as to birds, insects, reptiles, amphibians, small and large mammals, and more, each of which is in an ongoing ecological relationship with the others. Every forest is a hyperobject, an enormously complex environment that's shaped not just by its location, landscape, and climate but also by the history of humans in that place. If you go on a walk in the woods, what you see depends on the season and the particular path you take through it. More than anything, though, what you see in the woods depends on the eyes that you are seeing it through. A birder, a hunter, an entomologist, a soil ecologist, a real estate developer, and an artist will all see different things. Helen introduced me to Richard Mabey's idea that the natural world can only be understood and appreciated as a re- sult of careful, knowledgeable attention. Without the ability to describe the differences with detail and specificity, a meadow of native grasses and the pesticide-soaked monoculture of a golf course that replaces it are effectively indistinguishable.