There's just something about this story that feels so timeless, classical, and eternal. Everything is so allegorical, metaphorical, symbolic, and polysemic and I can't help but feel this is the kind-of book that should be re-visited serveral times throughout one's life. The only thing that brings it down somewhat, for me, is the occasionally confusing writing style. I'm sure this is most likely my fault and that I wasn't paying enough attention but there was a few times where the author jumped into a past story with little indication. The result of this was an overflow of confusion as to where the characters were and what they were doing.
User Profile
Animation Student at Arts University Bournemouth
This link opens in a pop-up window
Nathan John Cooper's books
View all booksUser Activity
Nathan John Cooper reviewed The Alchemist by Paulo Coelho
Nathan John Cooper <p>wants to read</p>
Shade's children by Garth Nix
In the brutal world of Shade's Children, your 14th birthday is your last. Malevolent Overlords rule the earth, directing hideous, …
Nathan John Cooper <p>finished reading</p>
The Alchemist by Paulo Coelho
Paulo Coelho's masterpiece tells the mystical story of Santiago, an Andalusian shepherd boy who yearns to travel in search of …
'We take death to reach a star' Vincent van Gogh
4 stars
This book made me really quite emotional. To hear Hawkin talk about AI (which is now more prominent than ever), the development into a multi-planetary species (which we are now closer to than ever), and fusion power (which has had recent and vast breakthroughs) without being here to witness their developments in rather upsetting. Steven Hawkin died in 2018, I was just fourteen years old. Weirdly, though, I remember crying a lot. I had heard lots about Hawkin, seen him on the news, and really enjoyed listening to the small news segments that would show clips of him talking. Five years later - and during the afterword to this short book - I found myself crying again. There is something so beautiful about Steven Hawkin's life and I find his story deeply inspiring. I am so grateful for the impact that he had on this world
Nathan John Cooper <p>finished reading</p>
Brief Answers to the Big Questions by Stephen Hawking
Brief Answers to the Big Questions is a popular science book written by physicist Stephen Hawking, and published by Hodder …
Nathan John Cooper commented on Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell
Content warning Spoiler Alert.
Why did the Thought Police wait so long?
I was reading-up on 1984 in forums and came across this question. Whilst I found it facinating, the answer caused even more intrigue. User 'Duane' stated the following:
Oh, goody, this is just begging* for a Doylist vs. Watsonian analysis...
The Watsonian reason is that the Thought Police wanted to study their victims like bugs under glass. Remember, the Thought Police agent lied to Winston when he told him there was no telescreen in the room he was renting to them. So they were already planning to monitor them with a hidden telescreen. They want to watch the deviants and traitors "in the wild", in order to learn about them so they can hone their skills of totalitarian oppression.
The Doylist reason is, of course, Orwell needed the delay in arrest so he could get write about Winston and Julia's thoughts and secrets and build up total empathy for them before beating them to a pulp...*
Nathan John Cooper <p>finished reading</p>
DNA by Dennis Kelly
A group of teenagers do something bad, really bad, then panic and cover the whole thing up. But when they …
The escape velocity is just over 11 kilometres per second for the Earth, and about 617 kilometres per second for the Sun. Both of these are much higher than the speed of real cannon balls. But they are low compared to the speed of light, which is 300,000 kilometres per second. Thus light can get away from the Earth or Sun without much difficulty. However, Michell argued that there could be stars that were much more massive than the Sun which had escape velocities greater than the speed of light. We would not be able to see them, because any light they sent out would be dragged back by gravity. Thus they would be what Michell called dark stars, what we now call black holes.
Great explanation on why black holes are so dark.
A nuclear war is still the most immediate danger, but there are others such as the release of a genetically engineered virus or the greenhouse effect becoming unstable.
The prevailing attitude at Oxford at that time was very anti-work. You were supposed to be brilliant without effort, or accept your limitations and get a fourth-class degree.
Nathan John Cooper <p>wants to read</p>
On Earth We're Briefly Gorgeous by Ocean Vuong
Brilliant, heartbreaking and highly original, Ocean Vuong's debut novel is a shattering portrait of a family, and a testament to …
Nathan John Cooper commented on Brief Answers to the Big Questions by Stephen Hawking
This book is dense with beautiful knowledge. I listened to the audiobook version whilst running at night and, thus, couldn't make the same notes I normally do. I am currently trying to find all the aspects that I wanted to take note of though.
Anthropic principle: The universe has to be (more-or-less) how we see it because, if it were different, there wouldn't be anyone here to observe it.
Nathan John Cooper <p>wants to read</p>
Nathan John Cooper commented on Brief Answers to the Big Questions by Stephen Hawking
After reading three fictitious and dystopian novels in short succession (Fahrenheit 451, Animal Farm, and Nineteen Eighty-Four), I now want to delve into some science reads. Speaking of, I have a list called 'Science Reads' of all the scientific books that stand-out to me for their quality if anyone is interested. The list is, of course, designed with myself in mind but, with the popularity of each book, will surely be appropriate for a rather large demographic.